coin-img-ETHETH-4.73%coin-img-BTCBTC-3.50%coin-img-SOLSOL-6.84%coin-img-XAUTXAUT-2.85%coin-img-PAXGPAXG-2.89%coin-img-BASEDBASED-4.36%coin-img-CDDCDD-45.61%coin-img-XRPXRP-4.93%coin-img-ETHETH-4.73%coin-img-BTCBTC-3.50%coin-img-SOLSOL-6.84%coin-img-XAUTXAUT-2.85%coin-img-PAXGPAXG-2.89%coin-img-BASEDBASED-4.36%coin-img-CDDCDD-45.61%coin-img-XRPXRP-4.93%coin-img-ETHETH-4.73%coin-img-BTCBTC-3.50%coin-img-SOLSOL-6.84%coin-img-XAUTXAUT-2.85%coin-img-PAXGPAXG-2.89%coin-img-BASEDBASED-4.36%coin-img-CDDCDD-45.61%coin-img-XRPXRP-4.93%coin-img-ETHETH-4.73%coin-img-BTCBTC-3.50%coin-img-SOLSOL-6.84%coin-img-XAUTXAUT-2.85%coin-img-PAXGPAXG-2.89%coin-img-BASEDBASED-4.36%coin-img-CDDCDD-45.61%coin-img-XRPXRP-4.93%

Breaking: Ledger CTO Says Drift Exploit Mirrors DPRK-Linked Bybit Hack Tactics

Ledger CTO Charles Guillemet (@P3b7_) says the recent Drift Protocol exploit used the same playbook as last year's Bybit hack, which has been widely attributed to DPRK-linked actors. According to Guillemet, the attackers did not take advantage of a single smart-contract bug. Instead, they quietly compromised the computers of multisig signers over time and manipulated them into approving a malicious transaction. "The signers may have believed they were signing a legitimate operation," he warned, adding that the codebase appeared clean while the human layer lacked protection.
DRIFT
DRIFT-31.43%
Disclaimer: The content above is only the author's opinion and does not represent BingX’s stance. It shall not be construed as investment advice from BingX. For details, refer to the Terms and Conditions.