Representatives from the crypto and banking sectors are scheduled to meet with congressional staff on Thursday and Friday to review updated compromise language covering stablecoin yield provisions in a broader market structure bill, according to three people familiar with the plans. The revised language, led by Senators Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.) and Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), was first shared with industry representatives last week. At that stage, the draft would have barred yield based solely on holding stablecoin balances, while still allowing firms to offer yield tied to certain activities. Participants said the crypto industry raised concerns about the approach. Politico first reported the meetings earlier Thursday. The bill text had been expected this week, but a release now appears unlikely. Crypto in America reported Wednesday that publication would slip, and one person familiar with the discussions told CoinDesk earlier this week that parts of the language were still under negotiation. Another source said some requested industry changes were largely technical clarifications rather than a shift in how yield would be treated. As of publication, it was unclear what changes were ultimately made or when the draft will be released publicly. Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) said last month she anticipated a markup hearing later in April, when lawmakers would debate the bill, consider amendments and vote on whether to move it to the full Senate. Senate Banking Committee rules require the text to be published at least 48 hours before such a hearing. Stablecoin yield and rewards remain the most visible issues slowing progress, but other unresolved questions persist, including how the bill will define and regulate decentralized finance (DeFi) and whether it will address U.S. President Donald Trump's family's involvement in various crypto projects.

Finance Canada said Bill C15 has received Royal Assent, clearing the way for a federal regime to regulate stablecoins and place the sector under closer supervision by the Bank of Canada. Officials are positioning fiat-backed stablecoins as part of Canada's payments and financial-market infrastructure, seeking to encourage digital-payment innovation while protecting consumers and safeguarding financial stability. Under the proposed framework, issuers of fiat-backed stablecoins would be required to register with the Bank of Canada and meet ongoing supervisory expectations. The rules would apply to both Canadian and foreign issuers that operate in the country, meaning widely used offshore stablecoins could also be captured. Policy documents indicate the central bank would monitor compliance, while the Department of Finance would lead rulemaking and legislative development. The framework sets out strict standards for reserves and redemption. Issuers would have to maintain a fully backed 1:1 reserve in cash or high-quality liquid assets, segregated from corporate funds. They would also be required to redeem stablecoins at par into the referenced fiat currency, aiming to reduce risks tied to undercollateralized or opaque backing. Restrictions would also govern how stablecoins are marketed and distributed. Issuers would be barred from paying interest or offering yield on holdings and would be required to avoid presenting stablecoins as bank deposits or legal tender. Governance, risk management, and data-security requirements would apply, alongside anti-money laundering compliance obligations. Although the legislation has now passed, implementation will be staged. Authorities expect regulatory work and consultations to continue over the next 12 to 18 months, with full rollout targeted for 2027. Canada's approach tracks a broader international shift to formalize stablecoin oversight, following regulatory developments in the United States and the European Union. By standardizing requirements and introducing central-bank supervision, Canada is moving to treat stablecoins as regulated financial instruments while supporting new payment use cases, including cross-border transfers, and limiting risks to consumers and the wider financial system. Final Summary: Canada's stablecoin framework would subject issuers to Bank of Canada oversight, marking a move toward regulated digital payment infrastructure. The plan aligns with global efforts to standardize stablecoin rules, with full implementation expected by 2027.

New York Fed President John C. Williams said March 30, 2026 that a jump in energy prices tied to developments in the Middle East could push inflation higher while also weighing on economic growth—a combination that threatens both pillars of the Federal Reserve's dual mandate: price stability and maximum employment. Williams described the situation as a supply shock that complicates monetary policy because it can lift prices without supporting activity. In his account, the same force that raises headline inflation can also erode household purchasing power and cool hiring. On inflation, Williams said the rise in energy costs is likely to add to price pressures in coming months. He noted inflation is hovering around 3%, still above the Fed's 2% longer-run goal, and said tariffs are contributing roughly 0.5 to 0.75 percentage point to that rate. An additional energy shock would widen the gap to target, limiting the scope for patience on rate decisions. On employment, Williams said higher energy bills can squeeze consumer budgets, leaving less room for discretionary spending and weakening demand. He pointed to an unemployment rate that has held in a tight 4.3% to 4.5% range since last July. While that suggests a labor market that remains stable, he warned that a prolonged energy shock could push joblessness higher if businesses respond to softer demand by cutting costs. Williams emphasized why this backdrop is uniquely challenging for policymakers: supply shocks tend to raise inflation and slow growth at the same time. As Reuters reported, he framed expensive energy as lifting inflation while putting downward pressure on growth—the type of two-sided stress where higher rates can curb inflation but deepen the growth drag, while lower rates can support activity but risk fueling inflation. Capital Economics chief economist Neil Shearing said central banks have limited ability to influence global energy prices directly, highlighting a constraint for the Fed: the shock originates outside U.S. monetary control, yet its effects land squarely within the Fed's mandate. Williams did not signal an imminent shift in interest rates. He said the current stance of policy is "well positioned" to balance risks to both goals, language that points to a wait-and-assess posture rather than a tilt toward either tightening or cuts. His remarks align with the March 18, 2026 FOMC statement, which said Middle East developments had increased uncertainty around the outlook and that the Committee was attentive to risks on both sides of the mandate. The federal funds target range remains 3.5% to 3.75%. Williams added detail to that framework by explaining how an energy-price shock can hit inflation and employment simultaneously. Markets have been sensitive to shifts in Fed expectations, and the broader risk backdrop has been reflected in volatility across rates-sensitive assets, including crypto. Bitcoin recently traded near $69,957 amid elevated liquidation risk on exchanges, underscoring how policy uncertainty can ripple through speculative positioning. Williams's comments also came against an economy already facing cross-currents: inflation near 3% is still well above target, and the labor market's steady 4.3% to 4.5% unemployment range leaves limited cushion if higher energy costs start to restrain spending and hiring. FAQ What is the Fed's dual mandate? The Federal Reserve's dual mandate, set by Congress, is to pursue price stability—inflation at 2% over the longer run—and maximum employment. Why do energy prices matter for both inflation and growth? Energy costs feed directly into headline inflation and raise input costs across the economy. At the same time, higher gasoline and electricity bills reduce purchasing power, weakening demand and potentially slowing hiring. Did Williams signal an immediate rate change? No. He said policy is "well positioned" to balance risks and did not preview an imminent move. How is this different from the 2022 energy shock? Williams framed the current risk as a Middle East-related supply shock arriving while inflation is already elevated in part by tariffs. The policy setting also differs: the fed funds rate is 3.5% to 3.75%, and the Fed has emphasized balancing risks to both sides of the mandate. Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.

Coinbase said it has received conditional approval from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to form Coinbase National Trust Company, a move that would place parts of its crypto custody and market infrastructure under federal supervision. The company announced the decision on 2 April, describing it as a step away from primarily state-based oversight toward a more consistent national framework for digital-asset services. Custody-focused trust charter, not a bank Coinbase emphasized the charter would not make it a commercial bank. It said the trust company would not accept deposits or originate loans, framing the license as designed for safekeeping and custody-related market infrastructure—consistent with how national trust charters are typically used in traditional financial markets. Coinbase said the structure could support growth in institutional custody, payments infrastructure and other services connected to digital assets. Shift from state regimes to federal oversight Until now, Coinbase has largely operated under state-level rules, including supervision by the New York Department of Financial Services. The OCC's conditional approval adds a federal layer, which Coinbase said should improve regulatory consistency for its custody operations. The development aligns with a broader trend in U.S. crypto regulation, as firms increasingly seek to operate under national frameworks rather than navigate a patchwork of state rules. Conditional approval means more requirements to meet The approval is not yet final. Coinbase must satisfy additional OCC conditions before the charter becomes fully effective—requirements that typically cover compliance readiness, risk management controls and governance standards. Part of a wider push to integrate crypto into traditional finance Coinbase's move comes as the industry pushes for clearer federal rules across stablecoins, tokenized assets and derivatives. The company said OCC supervision would strengthen its ability to serve institutional clients looking for regulated custody and infrastructure for digital assets. Final Summary Coinbase's conditional OCC approval points to increasing federal oversight of crypto custody and infrastructure in the U.S., reflecting a broader effort to integrate digital-asset services into established financial regulatory frameworks.

The Trump administration has filed a lawsuit against Illinois seeking to halt the state's regulation of prediction markets, arguing the rules encroach on federal authority, according to Reuters.

U.S. federal regulators have opened a new legal front over who gets to police prediction markets, moving to block state actions they say conflict with the national derivatives regime. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed lawsuits on April 2 against Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois. The complaints seek to reaffirm what the agencies describe as exclusive federal jurisdiction over designated contract markets that list event contracts. CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig said in a post on X that federal authority is "clear and longstanding," while arguing some state regulators have attempted to impose "inconsistent and contrary obligations" on CFTC-registered prediction markets. He said the three federal court actions were brought to reassert the agency's statutory authority. The CFTC is positioning the dispute as a challenge to the framework Congress established under the Commodity Exchange Act, which the agency says was designed to provide a unified, nationwide system for derivatives oversight. In the regulator's view, state-level interventions create conflicting requirements and add uncertainty for market participants operating across state lines. The agency recently issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking aimed at addressing confusion around prediction market regulation, and it signaled further rulemaking steps that could tighten and clarify compliance expectations for event contracts traded on federally supervised exchanges. Event contracts have been used for decades, including early academic markets tied to elections and economic data. Federal oversight expanded after the 2008 financial crisis, broadening regulation of contracts linked to commodities while preserving room for innovation alongside protections against manipulation and abusive practices. Selig said the CFTC will continue to defend its exclusive authority over these markets and protect participants from what he called overzealous state regulators. FAQ Why did the CFTC and DOJ sue states over prediction markets? They say they are defending exclusive federal jurisdiction and preventing state rules from disrupting regulated derivatives markets. How does the Commodity Exchange Act apply? The agencies argue it establishes a single federal framework that covers event contracts within the broader derivatives regime. What could this mean for market participants? A federal ruling could reduce regulatory uncertainty and standardize compliance requirements nationwide. Why do regulators see state actions as a risk? They say state requirements can conflict with federal rules, increasing operating complexity and legal exposure for exchanges and investors.

Arizona lawmakers are pushing forward legislation that would allow the state to treat XRP as a treasury asset. XRP was trading around $1.28, down 4.5% on the day, as broader crypto sentiment remained in "extreme fear" and a bearish call weighed on the market. Traders may be underestimating how close the proposal is to a full House vote. Senate Bill 1649 (SB1649) would establish a Digital Assets Strategic Reserve Fund and place confiscated, surrendered, or state-held digital assets under the direct control of the state treasurer. The bill explicitly names XRP alongside Bitcoin, stablecoins, and several other altcoins. The measure cleared the House Rules Committee on March 30, sending it to the full chamber for consideration. The text also authorizes the treasurer to seek additional returns via staking, airdrops, or limited lending, effectively positioning assets like XRP as yield-generating reserves. While the macro backdrop remains challenging, Ripple's growing institutional standing has kept long-term bulls engaged. Regardless of whether SB1649 ultimately passes, the proposal underscores a rising willingness at the state level to formalize crypto adoption. XRP market levels: $2 before the Arizona House vote? XRP continues to consolidate. Below $1.30, it is trading under its 50-day SMA of $1.44. RSI is around 43, leaning neutral-to-bearish and not yet in oversold territory. Key levels being watched include support at $1.25, with stronger support at $1.23. Resistance sits near $1.33–$1.34, while $1.40 is the level bulls would need to clear to signal a more meaningful recovery. In a constructive scenario, the Arizona House approves SB1649, ETF approval odds translate into a clearer timeline, and XRP retakes $1.42. That could reopen a route toward the $2.10 upper range some analysts cite for 2026. On the downside, a break below $1.25 could amplify macro-driven selling and pull XRP back into sub-$1.20 territory. One TradingView analyst flagged a developing bull-flag pattern, with a potentially sharp move depending on the direction of the breakout. Maxi Doge targets early-mover demand as XRP tests support XRP's 6% weekly decline highlights that even stronger projects can weaken in risk-off markets. For traders looking beyond a potentially prolonged consolidation in a roughly $80B asset, early-stage presales are being pitched as a higher-volatility alternative with more asymmetric upside. Maxi Doge ($MAXI) is an ERC-20 meme token built around a 240-lb dog mascot and an aggressively trader-oriented brand. The presale has raised $4.7 million, with tokens priced at $0.0002811 and advertised staking rewards of 66% APY for early participants. The project says it plans holder-only trading competitions with leaderboard rewards, a "Maxi Fund" treasury aimed at liquidity and partnerships, and meme-first marketing designed for viral reach. Supporters argue the current risk-off environment is pushing attention toward presale-stage tokens. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Crypto assets are highly volatile. Conduct your own research before investing.

Coinbase said on Thursday it has received a conditional bank charter from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, making it the latest cryptocurrency company to secure such approval.

The U.S. Department of Justice and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission have filed lawsuits against Illinois, Arizona, and Connecticut, seeking to shield prediction markets from state-level oversight. The agencies argue these products are subject to federal regulation only, not state rules. Over the past year, more states have moved to challenge prediction-market platforms, contending that sports-themed offerings are not event contracts under the CFTC's authority but effectively unregulated sports betting under a different label.